Gallatin County Jail Revenues Helps Sheriff’s Office Buy New Equipment…Or Is It Prison Profiteers?

Gallatin County Detention Center

According to the Bozeman Daily Chronicle,  Gallatin County Sheriff’s made revenue off the Gallatin County Detention Center (Jail).  Here’s a small excerpt of their report.

When the Gallatin County jail opened its doors in April 2011, officials didn’t quite grasp how much money the county would get from renting beds to out-of-county inmates.

But when that total reached more than $1 million in just two years?

“We were shocked,” said Gallatin County Commissioner Steve White. “We never expected to get that much.”

That first year, revenue from out-of-county inmates was $152,505.

In 2012, revenues increased by 78 percent to $271,715.

By the 2013 fiscal year, out-of-county jail inmates brought in more than $1 million. And last year was a record year with room-and-board inmates bringing in $2,018,235.

Through February of this year, jail revenue is just over $773,800 and is expected to be between $1.5-1.8 million by the end of the fiscal year in June.

And while a majority of those funds are put aside to help fund future expansion plans for the jail, a portion is given to the Gallatin County Sheriff’s Office. And Sheriff Brian Gootkin said those funds have helped his office catch up with important purchases.

For Commissioner White, the most important part of the funding is the 65 percent that gets set aside for future expansion.

Through the end of the second quarter of this fiscal year, the county has $2.03 million banked for future expansion. Gallatin County Finance Director Ed Blackman said they estimate that pot of money will be $2.4 million by the end of June.

“Our intention is to do the responsible thing,” White said.

But the small portion that has gone to the sheriff’s office has allowed the county to make purchases that would have otherwise come from county taxpayers, White said.

Even if the county didn’t have these jail funds, the expenses would still be there and the need to replace equipment would still exist, White said.

“Do you take it out of jail money or do you take it out of the pocket of the taxpayer?” White said. “We could have either shorted departments and services, or we could have bumped up taxes a little bit.”

Commissioner Don Seifert echoed White, saying jail money is preferable to taking it from the county’s general fund.

There are things in this article that make me go “hmmmmm”….

Is not the general fund paid by the taxpayers?  

They don’t plan on to continue to profiteer from Montanan’s being locked up, but they have huge plans for expansions that will generate more money.   Does not the taxpayer still fund all of this?  

Let’s take a look at what the media has to say about this kind of prison profiteering.  Six videos in a series titled “Prison Profiteers” 

According to another article Law Enforcement Agencies Across Montana Apply For Federal Cash:

The Gallatin County sheriff wants to apply for three grants totaling $202,484 from the Department of Homeland Security and is asking for the County Commission’s approval this week.

According to the Montana Department of Military Affairs, which is overseeing the applications, 64 Montana government agencies have started applications and 12 are complete. Most are for radio equipment or backup generators. The largest is the state Department of Justice’s request for $452,052 to fund the Montana All-Threat Intelligence Center, an intelligence clearinghouse linked to local, state and federal agencies.

The goal of the Department of Homeland Security state grant program — with $402 million in total available funding in 2015, including $3,734,500 earmarked for Montana agencies — is “to implement investments that build, sustain, and deliver the 31 core capabilities essential to achieving the National Preparedness Goal of a secure and resilient Nation.”

The sheriff’s justification for the night vision states they will be used to enhance terrorism prevention activities.

Montana, is this for “real terrorists” or for your children? Really?  How much money for prisons does one state with a small population need?  But then again,  remember back a few years ago this article? 

Montana Incarceration “It’s Business. It’s Dollars And Cents, And It’s Jobs.” Direct Quote To Law And Justice Committee



That was stated by your Montana officials.  They are making money off of you, the taxpayer, coming and going.  Taxes for getting you in prison, taxes to maintain you in prison, and taxes to expand to get more of you in prison.   All the while the fat cats rake in more, laughing all the way to the bank while they catch the unknowing mice.  Well, you know now! Why then are you letting them get away with this again on an even larger scale?   You have MORE inmates now than before!!  Ahhhhhh, yes, it’s that Budget request time……

Montana’s Prison Business, Overcrowding Prisons For The New Montana Budget



Too many hands in the pot. Now, Helena and Polson want to build a new jail. Yellowstone county wants to add 100 beds to their jail. Gallatin county is saving up to add to their jail.   
Let’s just take an add out in the tourism guide!  Maybe something like this…..

Blue Light Special! Need A Place For The Night? Montana Has A Bargain For YOU!


P.S.  Gallatin talks all about the benefits of this excess money, but something smells rotten.  Why then did the ACLU have to publish this document as recent as February 2015?  

Montana Jails In Crisis

Bozeman Daily Chronicle

Montana, let’s hope the new budget will reflect changes that are needed.  Let’s put hard earned tax money into a future of hope.  Not a future of despair. 

Private Prisons Raping The American Tax Payers


“Promising to keep private prison cells full will be illegal in Nebraska if a proposal from state Sen. Amanda McGill (D) becomes law.

McGill, who is running for higher state office this year, has introduced legislation banning the government from guaranteeing payment to private contractors regardless of the level of service the contractor provide. While that may sound so obvious as to be unnecessary, states often make those kinds of promises to corporations when they privatize public services.

The most notorious examples are private prison contracts that guarantee companies like the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) a certain minimum occupancy level at prisons, and promise to pay CCA the difference should prison populations sag below that level. Such “lock-up quotas” appear in two-thirds of all prison privatization contracts, according to a report last fall by the anti-privatization group In The Public Interest (ITPI).

Skyrocketing profits aside, the prison industry saw some setbacks last year. In a single month last fall, CCA lost contracts in Idaho, Texas, and Mississippi. The Idaho prison that closed was so violent and brutal that it was nicknamed “Gladiator School,” and CCA juiced its profits there by understaffing the facility, effectively outsourcing prison security to gangs of prisoners.

America spends 2.5 times as much per prisoner as it does per public school student. The country’s incarceration levels help drive economic inequality, and the combination of criminalization and neglect creates a “cradle-to-prison pipeline” for black and latino Americans.

McGill’s legislation would ban those kinds of payment guarantees across all state contracts, but is specifically targeted at prison contracts.”* The Young Turks hosts Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian break it down.

*Read more here from Alan Pyke / Think Progress:

Nebraska Lawmaker Wants Her State To Stop Paying Private Prisons For Empty Cells 

“Guaranteed Occupancy” Is a Crucial Part of the Business Model
When CCA made its 2012 offer to 48 states to buy the state prison systems outright, that offer came with one important condition: the state would have to “guarantee” a 90% occupancy rate. Last year, In the Public Interest (an anti-privatization group) reviewed 62 private prison contracts. Two-thirds of them (41 total) included occupancy requirements

Montana’s Jails In Crisis

Montana's Jails In Crisis.jpg

The report from the American Civil Liberties Union of Montana was released, analyzing conditions in county jails across the state. Just five months earlier they released a report on the mistreatment of pregnant Montana inmates.  

According to the ACLU of Montana:

In one 2012 case from the Yellowstone County Detention Facility, 27-year-old Angela Robinson told the ACLU that she was forced to give birth on the jail’s booking room floor, swaddling her baby in towels normally used “…for cleaning the floor and human excrement.”

In 2008, another prisoner made it to the hospital to deliver her baby, but was humiliated and put in harm’s way because detention officers insisted on keeping her in shackles throughout her labor and delivery against the advice of medical staff.

The vast majority of the 4,000 women booked into Montana county jails each year are non-violent offenders of reproductive age. Yet, even as the number of pregnant prisoners in jail grows and they are staying for longer periods of time, many county jails in Montana provide inadequate medical treatment to pregnant prisoners, and continue to engage in universally rejected practices such as shackling during labor and delivery. Our report seeks to address this issue, by documenting the problem and providing jail and detention center administrators recommendations on how to ensure pregnant prisoners get the care they need.

Most recently the ACLU of Montana did a walk through of these jails to get a first hand view of the situation and to survey the inmates.   Out of that study the Montana’s ACLU branch has released a 70-page report detailing problems like overcrowding and unsafe conditions in many detention centers across Montana. It includes reports of inadequate staffing and insufficient medical care.

“Montana’s detention centers are in crisis. Outdated facilities, inadequate staff, overcrowding, insufficient medical and mental health care, and an overwhelmed criminal justice system are status quo,” said Montana ACLU Executive Director Scott Crichton in a press release.

The report says researchers found trends like over-use of solitary confinement for mentally ill people and inadequate amounts of staff.

“There are reasons why everybody should have a concern about how we operate these places. If they are overcrowded, as they are, ask ourselves ‘Is there not a better way we could do this?'” said Crichton.

Missoula County Under-sheriff Jason Johnson told NBC Montana he is still in the process of reviewing the report, so he couldn’t respond to specific details, but he did say he plans on looking at the issues raised by the ACLU, and his office is committed to transparency.

“I look forward to hearing what the ACLU has to say. A lot of what I read in their press release are things that are very concerning with regards to overcrowding. Overcrowding is an issue that we face almost daily in our jail and it’s an issue that our community’s going to have to help us solve,” said Johnson.

Johnson says he plans to examine the facility’s approach to issues like mental health and he’ll hold a press conference on Wednesday to elaborate.

“The press release that came out from the ACLU also mentions the issues of having inmates with mental health [problems] and being able to service them properly. That’s something we want to do but it is a challenge we face every day,” said Johnson.

Both the ACLU and Disability Rights Of Montana have joined forces to combat this problem with the mental health issues within the Montana prison system.  Many voices that are not as big as these large organizations have worked tirelessly to get the word out to our legislators and the community.


So, here we go again Montana on the overcrowding issue. Missoula County Under-sheriff Jason Johnson basically said the same thing as Mark Johnson, supervisor at the Butte jail. Does anyone question the very high rates of incarceration in this state? Does anyone notice a fundamental problem throughout not only the jails but the prisons also?  Again, lets look at the following previous articles. 

  1. Montana’s Prison Business, Overcrowding Prisons For The New Montana Budget
  2. The Montana Bar Association And Prosecutorial Misconduct
  3. Montana Boosts Economy By Locking Up Native Americans
  4. Mental Illness And Prison
  5. ACLU Accuses Montana State Prison Of Illegal Activities
  6. Montana State Prison Has One Of The Highest Rates Or Rapes And Sexual Assaults Nationwide
  7. Montana Lawyers Expose State Prosecutors Corruption, AG’s Office Looks The Other Way
  8. Montana Did You Know?
  9. Montana Jailers Sued Again
  10. Montana Incarceration “It’s Business. It’s Dollars And Cents, And It’s Jobs.” Direct Quote From Montana Officials. 
  11. Has Montana Citizens Lost Their Heart? 

These are just 11 articles, there are almost 500 articles on this site.  Should I go on?   I keep hearing over and over how this is a community, Montana problem.  A solution then would be to adjust the over crowding issue.  Use the tax payer money to make the existing prisons and jails up to human standards, instead of lining a few peoples pockets to create more of a burden to society.  Don’t warehouse the mentally ill, help them get treatment.   Look into the states tons of allegations of corruption and misconduct.  Former Montana Governor Forrest Anderson had to address this problem once before and it’s time to be addressed again. 

Montana Governor Forrest Anderson

 MT Gov. Forrest Anderson

I would like to present some facts to the Legislature probably not known to most people. It deals with the corruption, waste, graft and greed of the Department of Corrections. If their budget (and corresponding prisoner incarceration levels) were reduced to what is actually and truthfully needed, that single act would solve the State’s Budget Crisis. The DOC is only interested keeping their beds full and expanding to waste more taxpayer funds. I sent this to Dave Lewis yesterday morning. I am hoping to find at least one member of the Legislature who is brave enough to become involved in the solution and not continue as part of the problem by voting to waste taxpayer dollars through endless funding to the DOC.

In the late 60’s and early 70’s the prison population was way up. A majority of the prison population had been either denied parole or were back in for trivial, technical violations. (Exactly the same situation as today.) The cell house was full and cells were double occupied. The Dorm and other housing areas were full. Forrest Anderson, who had previously been Attorney General, was elected Governor. From his tenure as A.G., knew the problems and the solution. He was well aware of the hateful, spiteful attitude toward prisoners from the staff and administration of the prison and parole board. He fired the Warden, the Director of the Department of Institutions and replaced the members of the Parole Board with instructions to reduce the population down to a level actually needed and to stop the long standing practice of revoking for technical violations. In less than a year, the population went down by about 50%. We need for something like that to happen again.

At one time, the prison was pretty much self-sustaining. It even produced a good share of the food for other state institutions until the crooks decided too much money was being saved by the taxpayers! The dairy produced milk, ice cream, cottage cheese, etc. There was a poultry operation which raised turkeys, and chickens for both meat and egg consumption. There were both beef and hog operations and a slaughterhouse and butcher shop which produced all the meat necessary to sustain the state institutions. They also grew all their own potatoes, cabbage and other vegetables. Then, a realization was made that all the millions of taxpayer dollars being saved could better be utilized by buying these products from local vendors. (Think of all the nice presents being received from those vendors for the business directed their way.)

Over the years, the administration has split positions and jobs so now it takes two or three people to do the exact same thing previously done by one person. This way, all of their friends and relatives can have a state job. Nice for those people but terrible for the taxpayers. The ratio of staff per prisoner is way too high for what is necessary for security and orderly operations. The staff utilizes state equipment for their personal and private use, etc. The above is just the tip of the iceberg. I would be willing to answer any questions or provide additional information. I am also attaching a report from Legislative Services which you may or may not have seen. It helps to demonstrate that the prison population is inflated by the practices and policies of the Parole Board and those practices and policies are contrary to the expectations of our judicial system.


Gary Quigg

Excerpt taken from: Montana’s Board Of Pardons And Parole And Their Gang

It’s All About Corrupt Money 

“U Raise ‘Em, We Cage ‘Em” – School To Prison Pipeline – Trafficking American’s Children

The T-shirt, put out by the Twin Rivers Police Officer's Association, has been rejected by even those who made it.

This T-shirt, put out by the Twin Rivers Police Officer’s Association, has been rejected by even those who made it.

Through the juvenile courts and the adult criminal justice system, the United States incarcerates more of its youth than any other country in the world, a reflection of the larger trends in incarceration practices in the United States. In 2010, approximately 70,800 juveniles were incarcerated in youth detention facilities alone.  Approximately 500,000 youth are brought to detention centers in a given year. This data does not reflect juveniles tried as adults. Around 40% are incarcerated in privatized, for-profit facilities.

The term “zero tolerance” is not defined in law or regulation; nor is there a single widely accepted practice definition. The United States Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, defined zero tolerance as “a policy that mandates predetermined consequences or punishments for specified offenses“.  The purpose of zero-tolerance policies, according to their proponents, is to send a message that certain kinds of behaviors are not tolerable on school grounds. About 94% of public schools in the United States have zero-tolerance policies for guns; 91% for other weapons; 88% for drugs; 87% for alcohol and 79% for tobacco.

But, in 2011, a study by the National Education Policy Center found that zero-tolerance policies across the nation were increasing suspension rates, with students being accused of offenses such as attendance violations, dress code violations, cell phone use, and other minor offenses. They found that zero-tolerance policies put children, particularly black and Latino children, on a path of truancy and likely incarceration. Black students are 3.5 times more likely to be suspended than White students and are held responsible for 70% of arrests while attending school. Simultaneously Latino students are 1.5 times more likely to be suspended than their White classmates.


America = The Prison Capital Of The World

Kiera Wilmot a Florida high school student who was arrested and expelled after a science experiment exploded, was known as a model student. She ran into trouble after combining aluminum foil and toilet bowl cleaner in a bottle as a science experiment. The mixture blew off a bottle cap and produced smoke. No one was injured and no property was damaged. Wilmot was charged with creating a chemical explosion on school grounds, and was expelled.

Keria Wilmot, Student, Aspiring Scientist

According to the ACLU, many schools rely on poorly trained police, rather than teachers and administrators, to handle minor school misconduct. The reality is that public schools have in the last 15 years undergone mass changes in school security policies. Video surveillance, drug-sniffing dogs, and sworn-in security officers are now commonplace fixtures in most public schools in the United States. Scholars argue that this increase in security measures is a result of rising fears about violence in schools.  One highly publicized example is the 1999 Columbine High School Shooting. The irony of the increase in security after the Columbine Shooting is that armed police officers were stationed at the Columbine High School at the time of the massacre, yet they were still unable to stop it. Now that police are more present in public schools, the line between disciplining under a schools’ general policy standards versus disciplining by law enforcement standards is getting blurred.

A 2012 school “lockdown” in Casa Grande, Arizona, included employees of the private Corrections Corporation of America company—unusual participants in a government policing action. Caroline Isaacs of the Tucson American Friends Service Committee said of the event: “To invite for-profit prison guards to conduct law enforcement actions in a high school is perhaps the most direct expression of the ‘schools-to-prison pipeline’ I’ve ever seen.”

The pipeline can also be critiqued in terms of neoliberalism, the idea that market forces can organize every facet of society. Because prisons can be privatized and run for profit, and traditional public schools cannot, the market favors sending people to prisons rather than schools—particularly if they are not destined to become part of the high-skilled workforce. (As prisoners, people can be compelled to perform labor anyway.) In keeping with this system, school budgets have shrunk while prison budgets have expanded massively, while even within schools more funding goes to police and less to teachers and children. The feedback loop between standardized testing and school funding is seen by some as another facet of neoliberalism, creating competition between students and teachers who need good test scores to keep their jobs.

Kids For Cash

School to Prison Pipeline – Wikipedia

America’s School Children Being Arrested

Proof that politicians corporations and the judicial system make more money if you or your children are sent to prison

Americans And Mass Wrongful Convictions – Prosecutors Addicted To Prosecutorial Misconduct


Growing Number Of Inmates Found Innocent In US Prisons

Published on Feb 11, 2015

An increasing number of prisoners are being set free after they were found to have been wrongly convicted, according to a new report from the University of Michigan that is raising eyebrows. Breaking down the 125 exonerations in 2014, the study’s authors found that the defendants in 47 cases had originally pleaded guilty despite being innocent, and in 58 instances, no crime had actually been committed. RT’s Manuel Rapalo explores.

America’s Guilt Mill – Thousands of Americans, many of them poor, are wrongfully convicted each year for crimes that don’t make headlines. While innocence advocates focus on lifers, those falsely accused of lesser crimes are the overlooked casualties of our overburdened courts.


Study Estimates Alarming Wrongful Conviction Rate On Death Row – Dr. Gross estimated that 4.1 percent of convictions resulting in a death sentence are wrongful convictions. This is an alarming number, especially when understood in context. Specifically, if death row convictions are that wrong so frequently, it is very likely that wrongful convictions occur even more often in cases with less serious consequences.


National Registry of Exonerations:  2014 was Record-breaking with 125 Exonerations in U.S. – For the first time, more than 100 exonerations were recorded in the United States in one year. According to The National Registry of Exonerations Report for 2014, 125 exonerations of innocent criminal defendants mark an increase of 34 over the prior record of 91 in 2012 and 91 again in 2013. The report notes the work of Conviction Integrity Units in the increase.

The 24-page report, released on January 27, 2015, is available (here).

An information graphic illustrating patterns and trends can be viewed (here).



America We’ve Got A Problem! 

Prosecutors, Judges And Misconduct

Data Report: More Than 2,000 False Convictions In Past 23 Years They Allot Over 10,000 Years! 

Innocent Death Row Inmate Of 17 Years Now Performing On Center Stage

Montana, are you really going to try to justify and get away with the fact that your incarceration rate is higher than any other state around you and with only a population of 1 million?  The Montana Department of Corrections and Montana Department of Justice are trying to say that violent crime is on the increase, that crime itself is on the increase….yet….


Does perjury and misconduct by officials count as part of that crime increase, Montana? 

Horrifying Video: Prison Guards Callously Laugh as Mentally Ill Man Dies in Front of Them

We see Mr. Lopez struggling to breath for hours, and then, finally, we have an unobstructed view as Mr. Lopez takes his last breath, dying, half-naked on the cold concrete floor of a prison cell – isolated and alone with no Defendant caring whether he lived or died”

Horrifying Video: Prison Guards Callously Laugh as Mentally Ill Man Dies in Front of Them.

This awful ordeal began at 3:30 in the morning, and at 9:10 a.m., Mr. Lopez took his last breath and died, shackled and face down in the intake cell with no help from the people watching him struggle.

Three employees have been fired, and five others disciplined. No criminal charges were filed.

If Fyodor Dostoyevsky was correct in stating that you can judge a society by how well it treats its prisoners, this video is a very horrific display of what our society has become.  We can do better.

Read the full lawsuit here.

Via The Free Thought Project


Montana’s Prison Business, Overcrowding Prisons For The New Montana Budget


Montana 2017 Budget

According to the Missoulian  this is what he had to report:

The number of criminal offenders in Montana’s correctional system has increased by about 2,000 people in the past year, pushing the system to its limits, state Corrections Director Mike Batista said Monday.

“We are at or near capacity in our prisons and our probation-and-parole and community programs,”

Batista told a legislative panel.

He said in the past year, the total number of offenders either in prison, in community programs or under supervision of the Corrections Department has grown by some 2,000 people to 15,400.


For those of you who don’t know State Corrections Director Mike Batista, he was the former head of the DIVISION OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION within the Department of Justice before this present position.  Mike Batista has always been at the Law and Justice meetings requesting more funds to lock people up, regardless his position. Different advocates have tried to contact him after he has said that he would meet with them. He never follows through. I personally was told by him to call him, he never answered my phone call.

This Corrections system is now up to 15,400 people, a major increase from when the rates were brought up to the Law and Justice back in 2012.  What’s the deal?  For one thing, it’s a common known fact among those that work in the advocacy field that when it comes close to requesting funds from the legislature they always increase the inmate population, crowding cells, making it dangerous, making it look like a dire situation that needs to be addressed immediately.  To be addressed by giving them more money.

Despite all the data presented to the Legislature, testimonies presented to the legislature from both former workers of MDOC and families of inmates, plus advocates, DOC blatantly throws in their face that everything is fabricated by all.  Everyone else just “must be liars” or “stupid”….thinking that even the Montana Legislature is dumb and naive.

According to another article in the Billings Gazette,  

No room at Montana State Prison

Is it just me or did this remind anyone else of “No room in the Inn for the baby Jesus”…. ?  Weird.

“It’s a problem across the state,” said Leroy Kirkegard, warden at the Montana State Prison in Deer Lodge.

A few months ago, the prison had more than 100 offenders awaiting a cell at the prison, he said. Another 300 were on waiting lists for other Montana Department of Corrections facilities.

“We’re in that same boat just on a larger scale,” Kirkegard said.

“We’ll find room for them somewhere,” he said. The prison’s average population is 1,450.

One of those places has been the Butte-Silver Bow Detention Center.

Butte’s general capacity is 72 inmates. This year, the average has been 80. The highest was 96 offenders housed, said Mark Johnson, jail supervisor.

“This is the highest it’s been consistently for quite a while,” Johnson said. “There’s nowhere to put them. If we don’t have the beds, we just don’t have them.”

“This is not a Butte problem. It’s a Montana problem,” he added.

The state reimburses the jails for their beds at a rate ranging from $55 to $100 depending on the operating costs. Housing an inmate at the state prison costs about $100 a day per inmate.

While some county jails have resorted to putting inmates on cots in all corners of the detention center, Johnson says that is not the answer.

“The goal is not to have to do that,” he said. “Once you put them on the floor, you’ll never get them off the floor.”

When the numbers are high, the local jail instead will have officers give a notice to appear to offenders instead of booking them in for crimes such as disorderly conduct or driving on a suspended license.

“This is the way society has changed. Crime is increasing.”

Officials acknowledge the growing problems. More violence equals longer prison terms.

“I think the sentences are consistent with the offenses being committed. What alternative do these judges have?” Cox added.

Kirkegard and other state officials are exploring those options. The warden is working to launch a dramatic restructuring of the way Montana deals with inmates following an assessment from consultants. The initiative would involved more placement of offenders in communities under the supervision of probation and parole.

Mike Thatcher, chief executive officer for Butte-based Community Counseling and Correctional Services, which runs treatment and incarceration programs, said he not surprisingly supports much of the initiative.

“In general, it’s been an overwhelming and taxing problem,” he said. Many of those community-based programs are at capacity or running over as well, Thatcher said.

Thatcher is optimistic but concerned.

“Hopefully the shift isn’t that we overwhelm our community resources as well,” he said.


Oh boy!  The reports these good ole boys are giving to the local media!  Let’s break it down Montana:

In response to the statement “This is the way society has changed. Crime is increasing.”

First of all, Americans are prone to thinking crime rates are getting worse even when they’re actually improving.

“What we found when we asked a series of questions pertaining to fears of various crimes is that a majority of Americans not only fear crimes such as, child abduction, gang violence, sexual assaults and others; but they also believe these crimes (and others) have increased over the past 20 years,” said Dr. Edward Day who led this portion of the survey. “When we looked at statistical data from police and FBI records, it showed crime has actually decreased in America in the past 20 years. Criminologists often get angry responses when we try to tell people the crime rate has gone down.”

Despite evidence to the contrary, Americans do not feel like the United States is becoming a safer place. The Chapman Survey on American Fears asked how they think prevalence of several crimes today compare with 20 years ago. In all cases, the clear majority of respondents were pessimistic; and in all cases Americans believe crime has at least remained steady. Specific crimes queried in the survey were: child abduction, gang violence, human trafficking, mass riots, pedophilia, school shootings, serial killing and sexual assault.

Taken from: Crime Is Down, But Americans Are Convinced It’s Rising

They say that violent crimes have increased, that crime has risen in general.  But the FBI says otherwise.

FBI: Violent crime drops, reaches 1970s level

According to the FBI, violent crimes including murders fell 4.4 percent in 2013 to their lowest number since the 1970s, continuing a decades-long downturn.

In an analysis, the non-profit Pew Charitable Trusts said the drop in crime coincided with a decline in the prison population, with the number of U.S. prisoners down 6 percent in 2013 from its peak in 2008.

Thirty-two of the 50 states have seen a drop in crime rates as the rate of imprisonment fell, Pew said.

FBI Data

Perceptions Haven’t Caught Up To Decline In Crime 


Well, apparently Montana is not in that 32, and must be an awful lot,  the crime is increasing to such heights with only a population of a million.  Are these officials saying that the Montanan’s are a different breed of people that require increase of jails, prisons, law enforcement, etc?  Oh Montana!

Now, let’s talk about that optimistic statement by Mike Thatcher, chief executive officer for Butte-based Community Counseling and Correctional Services, which runs treatment and incarceration programs, said he not surprisingly supports much of the initiative.

Oh I bet he does support the initiative.  Let’s take a closer look.

Mike Thatcher – Chief Executive Officer for Community Counseling and Correctional Services, Inc. 

Contracts Vendor List (C)


The following is through Mike Thatcher which can be found on the Montana DOC.

For FYE 6-30-2015 Mike Thatcher was paid a grand total of $19,813,230.00 + Unlimited Funds for Transporting Inmates. 

Let’s look at that  CCCS Transportation (COR14-2857A) –  Contract For Offender Transport Services

*Example – Page 8 of Contract

5.  Consideration Payment

5.1 Payment Schedule – In consideration of the Offender Transport Services to be provided, the State shall pay the contractor monthly.  The Inmate Transportation Services provided will be billed at a flat fee of $350 for each transport.

7.  Exclusive Contract

The intent of this contract is to provide state agencies with an expedited means of procuring supplies and/or services.  This contract is to be considered an “exclusive” use contract and state agencies must obtain the specified product/service from the contract holder(s), unless the contract allows otherwise.  However, the State Procurement Bureau does not guarantee any minimum usage totals and it’s the individual agency’s responsibility to comply with the terms of contract.

If you look further down that documentation you will see the transportation was requested for the Great Falls Regional Prison from Montana State Prison.  Not for CCCS, but CCCS seems to get paid for this service.

This brought up a red flag for a former legislative budget auditor,  who asked the following question.

I have a problem understanding why DOC would contract with and pay CCCS (Mike Thatcher’s company) $350 per inmate transfer from MSP to CCC( Shelby) and/or Great Falls Regional Prison.

I also have a problem understanding how one man can sign contracts with DOC amounting to over $ 20 million per year and more than likely not be audited. How can one man’s company have responsibility To transport at a fee, counsel at a fee,  have inmates in pre-release at a fee, charge the inmate transitional living at a fee add ESP at a fee then recycle the inmate through the whole process at a fee.

Follow the money and I am sure that you will soon learn why Mr. Batista’s prison business has grown by 2000 in one year as he told the Interim Law and Justice Committee. Rudy Stock

Remember this article:  Department Of Juvenile Justice Calls Nonprofit Executive’s Pay Of $1.2 Million ‘Excessive’

Follow The Money

Follow The Money

Plus, get this…


Department of Corrections – Secure Facilities $7,000,000 General Fund 


This is money they want now, this does not include the money in the 2017 Budget.