U.S. Supreme Court Has Ruled That Defendants Have A Constitutional Right To Effective Assistance Of Counsel In Plea Bargains

High Court Expands Defendants’ Plea Bargain Rights

by 

March 21, 2012

For the first time, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that defendants have a constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel in plea bargains. In a 5-4 decision Wednesday, the court went further, declaring that when a lawyer acts unethically or gives clearly wrong advice, the defendant may be entitled to a second chance at accepting a plea offer.

The court’s ruling came in two cases. In one, Missouri college student Galin Frye was charged with a felony for a fourth offense of driving with a revoked license. The prosecutor sent Frye’s lawyer a letter offering to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor if Frye would plead guilty and agree to a 90-day sentence. The lawyer, however, never informed his client of the offer, and when it expired, an uninformed Frye pleaded guilty with no conditions and was sentenced to three years in prison, more than 10 times the plea bargain offer.

In a second case, Anthony Cooper was charged with assault with intent to murder after he shot a woman in the thigh and buttocks. Prosecutors twice offered a plea deal with a recommended prison term of four to seven years, but Cooper’s lawyer advised him to reject the offer, because the lawyer said Michigan law did not permit an attempted murder conviction for wounds below the waist. The advice was indisputably wrong and Cooper was tried, convicted and sentenced to three times as much prison time.

In both cases, the state conceded that the defense lawyers provided ineffective legal assistance to their clients. But the states contended that didn’t matter since there is no constitutional right to a plea bargain. On Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court rejected that argument by a 5-4 vote.

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, shown on Capitol Hill in April 2011, wrote the court's ruling Wednesday that for the most part, plea bargaining determines "who goes to jail and for how long. It is not some adjunct to the criminal justice system. It is the criminal justice system."

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, shown on Capitol Hill in April 2011, wrote the court’s ruling Wednesday that for the most part, plea bargaining determines “who goes to jail and for how long. It is not some adjunct to the criminal justice system. It is the criminal justice system.”

To Continue Reading:  http://www.npr.org/2012/03/21/149093334/high-court-throws-out-conviction-in-bad-lawyer-case

I believe that there are cases that need to be re-opened in Montana due to ineffective counsel.  When the ACLU has to step in due to Montana public defenders not doing their jobs for several different reasons there is definitely a problem.  When a public defender in Montana has to lie to her client to enforce a plea bargain that is just plain unethical. 

Categories: The Innocent | Tags: , , , | 4 Comments

Post navigation

4 thoughts on “U.S. Supreme Court Has Ruled That Defendants Have A Constitutional Right To Effective Assistance Of Counsel In Plea Bargains

  1. however, the vast majority of folk who really need their counsel are assigned overworked and in some cases attorney’s who could care less about “justice” for their ‘assignment/case load’ and just take what they’re offered, benefit to their ‘client’ be damned.

    nice post – as usual – my friend

    • You are exactly right. I have watched some defense attorney’s and the look on their faces explains it all. They don’t want to do their job, it is what was given to them. How can a defendant receive fair representation that way? It still astounds me that in Montana a public defender for 6 years never stepped foot into the courtroom to defend a client. A successful “plea bargain” was arranged. I personally do not call that successful and would be ashamed.

      Thank you – my friend. :)

  2. Pingback: U.S. Supreme Court : We Are Evading Eligibility! | Political Vel Craft

  3. Pingback: the great writ… Naw, not so great says the U.S. Supreme Court… just average says Scalia « invincibleignorance

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com. The Adventure Journal Theme.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 526 other followers

%d bloggers like this: