Posts Tagged With: ACLU

Julie On Justice: A Season Of Compassion

December 2012
Dear MeJustice:
Happy Season of Compassion! Okay, well maybe there’s no official season by that name, but I always think of this time of year — from Thanksgiving through Hanukah and Christmas — as the season when people are at their most giving and compassionate. It’s during this season that we give thanks for the blessings in our life and try to remember, if not serve, those who might be struggling.
Last week, FAMM joined with Human Rights Watch (HRW) to release a new report on a law that was designed to show compassion to those in prison who really need it. That law, passed nearly 30 years ago, gave federal courts authority to grant people early release from prison — commonly referred to as “compassionate release” — for “extraordinary and compelling” reasons such as imminent death or serious incapacitation. The law makes good sense.The law comes with one serious catch, however. A judge cannot grant a prisoner compassionate release unless the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) files a motion asking the judge to do so. The FAMM-HRW report, titled “The Answer is No: Too Little Compassionate Release in U.S. Federal Prisons,” revealed that the BOP makes such motions very rarely. Since 1992, the BOP has filed only two dozen motions per year, despite the fact that the federal prison population now exceeds 218,000 and is getting older.The BOP’s disregard for the law and lack of compassion has resulted in families being kept from their incarcerated loved ones when they died, and in taxpayers footing the bill for extraordinary, end-of-life health care expenses that could have been shouldered by the offenders or their families. This is the kind of nonsense that happens when jailers think it’s their job to be judges.Our new report does not simply point out the problem; it also proposes solutions. I hope Congress and the administration will heed our call for reform, a call we plan to echo in the coming weeks and months. Given how much press coverage our report has generated — from the Associated Press to National Public Radio and many others — everyone should be aware of the problem now. Mary Price, our VP and general counsel, deserves enormous credit for her hard work on this report, as does her co-author, Jamie Fellner of HRW.The Bureau of Prisons is not the only part of government failing to demonstrate mercy and compassion. President Obama, who said during the 2008 campaign that he knew how excessive drug mandatory minimum sentences are, has granted fewer pardons and commutations than any modern president. What’s stopping him?The President could start by granting clemency to every federal prisoner serving a life prison sentence for drugs only! (Considering that a recent poll showed that just 7 percent of the American public thinks the drug war is working, Obama would be safe demonstrating that kind of mercy.) Or he could grant clemency to the prisoners serving crack cocaine sentences who didn’t benefit from the crack reforms passed two years ago because the reforms were not made retroactive. Talk about righting a wrong!

The President should also attend the forum we’re cohosting with the Heritage Foundation and the Constitution Project on December 10th to discuss ways to fix the broken clemency process. He would learn a lot!

Showing mercy through the robust use of compassionate release and presidential commutations could free thousands of people from prison who are not a threat to the public safety. If the President and the Bureau of Prisons need help finding deserving prisoners, we’re happy to assist them — we know lots of them.

In fact, it’s painful to think of the thousands of people in prison we know who will celebrate another holiday without their families. But I hope you will think about them. I hope you’ll make a phone call, or send a card or an email to a prisoner or a family affected by incarceration to remind them that they are not forgotten. It’s a simple act of caring that can spread great joy.

The Dalai Lama wisely observed, “If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion.” Those are words to live by.

I hope you stay healthy and happy during this Season of Compassion!

My best,

Julie

Julie Stewart
FAMM President
Categories: Guest Letter | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

America’s Growing Problem – A Jail Is Not A Place For The Mentally Ill

Photo: Rick Nease, MCT/Detroit Free Press

According to the Prisonmovements Weblog , an article by RICH STANEK,

Montana is not the only state that has a huge problem with the mentally ill.

The largest mental-health facilities in the United States are not hospitals — they are jails: in L.A. County, in Chicago’s Cook County, and on New York’s Rikers Island. Locally on any given day, the Hennepin County Medical Center Psychiatric Inpatient facility holds fewer mentally ill individuals than we hold in the Hennepin County jail, and quite frankly, many of these folks do not belong in our jail.

Over 35,000 inmates each year are booked into the Hennepin County jail. The Sheriff’s Office manages and operates the jail, and is responsible for the safe and secure custody of approximately 750 inmates each day as they await the resolution of their criminal charges by the court. We provide food and required medical care. We securely transport inmates to court appearances and to other facilities as determined by the courts. We estimate that as many as 25 percent to 30 percent of inmates suffer from mental illness.

The jail has medical and nursing staff who regularly check on inmates and provide prescribed medications and mental-health screenings. The Sheriff’s Office created a mental-health unit to allow for appropriate identification and placement of inmates with mental illness. Sheriff’s Office personnel receive extensive training on custody and safety issues for mentally ill inmates. The program has won a national award for its innovative and humane approach.

Even so, we know that a jail is not the right place to house the mentally ill for extended periods of time. In particular, I am concerned about criminal defendants with persistent and severe mental illness who have been determined by the court to be incompetent to stand trial, and those who have been civilly committed for up to six months at a time (because they are mentally ill and a danger to themselves or others). These inmates have been evaluated by licensed psychologists and have been ordered to the care and custody of the Minnesota State Department of Human Services (DHS). Yet, the Sheriff’s Office often is unable to make transfers, because there is a shortage of space at a suitable treatment facility. As a result, many of the mentally ill inmates stay in our jail for weeks and even months awaiting transfer and placement.

As an example, “T,” a 28-year-old male, was arrested by Richfield police and charged with felony possession of a firearm; he was booked into the jail in July. He suffers from grossly disturbed behavior and faulty perceptions, and he poses a substantial likelihood of causing physical harm. He was evaluated by a court-appointed forensic psychologist and was determined by the court in mid-August to be incompetent to stand trial. After further evaluation, the criminal charges against T were stayed in late October, and he was committed by order of the court to the custody of the Commissioner of Human Services for inpatient hospitalization for six months.

Continue Reading @ StarTribune

Related articles

If you browse throughout this website, here in Montana we have a severe problem with this issue.  Inmates that are yanked cold turkey off of much needed medication.  Inmates that are driven to the brink of despair in how our Montana system is medically treating them, many that have committed suicide.  Inmates or patients being flip flopped between mental hospitals and prisons.  More organizations and more Montana citizens are standing up to this ever growing challenge.  We are being the voice for those whose voices cannot be heard.

America, we have a problem.  Montana we can do our part to correct it in our state.  Especially since we seem to thrive on locking citizens up for profit.  Why is our incarceration rate higher than any state around us? With us only having a population of 1 million?

Review the data generated by our department through the state – Montana’s Incarceration Rates.

 

 

 

Categories: MDOC/Abuse | Tags: , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Only 8 Months And 30,000 Hits, Thank You Viewers

State Officials Surprised How Fast The Wildfire Is Spreading

Thank you for the support in making this blog a success so far.  It was only created at the beginning of this year 2012 and in 8 months it is growing rapidly.   Montanans are standing up to be heard.  We are crisscrossing the state and around the world.  

Here is the top 15 (of 308) most visited posts, 31 pages

  1. Female Prison Guards Often Behind Sex Misconduct?
  2. Susie & Johnny Sitting In A Tree……………….. K I S S I N G = SEX CRIMINALS
  3. The Incarcerated MT Fireman – Allen Whetstone – Part 1
  4. Civil Rights Cases filed in the Montana District Court
  5. MONTANA LAW CLERK CHARGES JUDGE THEN FILES FOR JUDGES JOB
  6. Montana’s Dirty Sex Secret
  7. Barry Beach Of Montana Awaiting New Trial And NBC Dateline
  8. Teaching Sex Acts To 11 Year Old Children In School, Could This Be A Setup For A Future Generation Of Inmates?
  9. Montana Parole Board And Pardons
  10. Press Release From ACLU About Inmate In MDOC
  11. Gloria Wells – Ex-Inmate With Complaints
  12. Montana State Prison: Female Prison Guards Fired For Sexual Misconduct
  13. New Definition Of Montana Cowboy=Sex Offenders?
  14. INMATES FIGHT AT MONTANA STATE PRISON
  15. Testimonies Of The Incarcerated Versus Montana Correctional Signpost

30,059 views as of 9/26/2012

958 views on busiest day

Thank you for all the comments and being actively supportive. What started out as just a message of enlightenment has transpired into a solid wall of citizens and organizations across Montana to fight for Integrity and Justice.  We have only just begun! 

30000

Categories: MT Speaks Up | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment

Montana ACLU Has Filed Two Law Suits Over Conditions At Montana Women’s Prison And Missoula County Jail

ACLU sues state over ‘degrading’ treatment at Montana Women’s Prison

September 15, 2012 8:49 am  •  Associated Press

BILLINGS — A federal lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union accuses the Montana Department of Corrections of forcing women prisoners to participate in a degrading treatment program not required of male inmates.

The advocacy group’s complaint, filed earlier this month on behalf of seven female prisoners, targets the five-year-old “Right Living Community” program at the Montana Women’s Prison in Billings.

The suit claims that female inmates are forced to participate in children’s games like “Duck Duck Goose” and “Simon Says” or risk being put into solitary confinement. And unlike male inmates who participate in military-like boot camp programs, the ACLU says women in the Right Living program do not have a chance for sentence reductions.

Department of Corrections spokesman Bob Anez says the agency will respond in court.

BILLINGS — A federal lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union accuses the Montana Department of Corrections of forcing women prisoners to participate in a degrading treatment program not required of male inmates.

The advocacy group’s complaint, filed earlier this month on behalf of seven female prisoners, targets the five-year-old “Right Living Community” program at the Montana Women’s Prison in Billings.

The suit claims that female inmates are forced to participate in children’s games like “Duck Duck Goose” and “Simon Says” or risk being put into solitary confinement. And unlike male inmates who participate in military-like boot camp programs, the ACLU says women in the Right Living program do not have a chance for sentence reductions.

Department of Corrections spokesman Bob Anez says the agency will respond in court.

Article Source:  http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/aclu-sues-state-over-degrading-treatment-at-montana-women-s/article_228703fe-ff44-11e1-b69d-001a4bcf887a.html

ACLU files suit against Missoula County jail

September 14, 2012 6:15 am  •  By ROB CHANEY of the Missoulian

They share the same jail, but men, women and children don’t get the same access to fresh air and sunlight, according to a lawsuit filed against the Missoula County Detention Center.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Montana sued Missoula County Sheriff Carl Ibsen, Detention Center Capt. Jason Kowalski, Chief Detention Officer Mark Foss and Detention Sgt. Mark Harris on behalf of three prisoners, Laurna Chief Goes Out, Lynda French and Brandy Burkowski. The suit was filed in Montana District Court on Wednesday.

“The men get an hour of outdoor exercise every single day, but the women never see the light of day,” said University of Montana law professor Greg Munro, who’s volunteering his assistance to the ACLU in the case. “They take turns trying to stand in the sunshine that sometimes makes it to the floor of the gym, just to get some sun. They are pale. The children, the juveniles, are incarcerated for extended periods of time and never see the outdoors. Our contention is they’re not getting what they need.”

Sheriff Ibsen said on Thursday that he’d seen an email version of the lawsuit, but was not ready to make any direct response to it.

To Continue Reading: http://missoulian.com/news/local/aclu-files-suit-against-missoula-county-jail/article_1aea1eea-fdd9-11e1-9581-0019bb2963f4.html

Many of the comments from readers on these articles thought this was ridiculous.  And from the wording of the article it does sound like children’s games are not a reason to sue.  What anyone has failed to mention is it is not right to put one in solitary over something like that.  Beyond that no one has mentioned how at the Law and Justice Meeting back in April of 2012 a former female inmate gave testimony about the atrocities that happen behind the walls.  She herself was sexually assaulted and testified that others were also.  She testified that the females have to serve 90% of their sentence compared to male inmates being eligible for parole after serving 25% of their sentence.  (Although we do see that male inmates don’t get out of prison just because they are eligible for parole.)   We have had other ex-inmates from the Montana Women’s Prison inform us of sexual assaults against the women, women having miscarriages and other treatments against them.  

We seem to have an issue in Montana with officers having frequent sex with inmates both male inmates and female inmates.   Montana citizens you need to become educated on what is really happening within the prison system in your own state!  We have inmates that are innocent, those that have been rail-roaded, inmates that never get paroled, sexual assaults against inmates by officers, officers bringing in contraband, etc.   Yes, criminals need to be behind bars but we also have a major injustice happening within this system.  We have officials and state employees committing crimes and no one cares.  Read all of the articles within this website, learn what is happening to your fellow Montanan citizens.  Educate yourself before you criticize….please.  

Categories: MDOC/Abuse, MT Speaks Up | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Inmates And Families Punished By Montana State Prison Starting This Month Of June 2012

 l

Director, Mike Ferriter, Montana Department Of Corrections 

 Ferriter oversees an agency with 1,300 employees, an annual budget of about $170 million 

It has been brought to our attention by many that are upset with Montana State Prison.   Montana Department Of Corrections has implemented new rules for a certain segment of the population.  Only a certain segment, not the whole population.  They have picked out a certain portion of inmates and keep them more isolated.  Anyone that is under sex offender or violent offender is not allowed to have visits except for two days a week now. Only on Wednesdays and Fridays.  Hours are shorter also.   So, families that work and families where their own children are in school will never be allowed to see their parent, or loved one again.   The phone calls are so expensive that it is hard to afford to talk to them on the phone.  No weekend visits allowed.  Father’s Day was just celebrated and families were not allowed to see their fathers.  Wives cannot see their husbands.   Who implemented this new rule,  without warning?  One week warning is not enough.  Inmates did not know about it.  DOC posted it on a board in the units about a week before it took effect.  They could not warn their families and some showed up and were turned away.   Visitors, just several days before it took effect, could get a handout sitting on the check in desk.

Revisions to the visiting procedures at Montana State Prison took effect Wednesday, June 6.
Inmates were notified of the changes earlier. The revised procedures can be found on the
Department of Corrections website at
http://www.cor.mt.gov/Facts/visitingInformation/msp.mcpx. Also available on the website are
downloadable copies of the visitor questionnaire and the dress code for visitors.
The changes involve:
 posting of visiting rules and regulation
 availability of visitor questionnaires
 visiting by current and former Department of Corrections employees
 notification of visitor applicants
 applicants ability to appeal a decision
 attorneys listed on as an inmate’s regular visitor
 accommodation of visitors with medical issues
 visiting hours for adults and children
 items visitors are allowed to have with them
 the process for terminating, suspending and revoking visiting privileges

The National
Bill of Rights for
Children of the Incarcerated*
Every child with a parent in prison (or alternatives to
prison) has the following rights:
1. To be kept safe and informed at the time of my
parent’s arrest;
2. To be heard when decisions are made about me;
3. To be considered when decisions are made about
my parent;
4. To be well-cared for in my parent’s absence;
5. To speak with, see, and touch my parent;
6. To support as I face my parent’s incarceration;
7. To not be judged, blamed or labeled because my
parent is incarcerated;
8. To have a lifelong relationship with my parent.

MAFTI Guide for Caregivers                                                                  Page 3

4. When can I see my family member?
In most cases, family members can visit in jail, prison or other correctional facilities. The Montana Department of Corrections (DOC) supports the connection between children andtheir parents if contact is safe and appropriate for the child.
The best answer is one that gives the child a specific time to
look forward to, but only if you are sure.

Page 10 MAFTI Guide for Caregivers

 Source: http://www.cor.mt.gov/content/Victims/FamilyMembersBehindBars.pdf

Montana State Prison Inmate Visiting
June 2012

Definitions

Immediate family member – An inmate’s legal spouse, natural or adoptive parents and children, siblings, grandchildren, grandparents, corresponding in-law, person verified as being primarily responsible for raising the inmate in the absence of a parent and any other member of the inmate’s household.

General Requirements
  • Visiting is a privilege and not a right for both inmates and members of the general public.

Hours of visitation:

  • Visiting is allowed Wednesday through Sunday. Visitors arriving on any other day will be turned away.
  • Visitors may not arrive on prison property prior to 2:15 p.m. or after 4:50 p.m. Visitors arriving prior to 2:15 p.m. or after 4:50 p.m. will be turned away.
  • All visiting may be cancelled or terminated at any time due to security concerns.
  • General population inmates housed in units A, B, C, D, HSU-I, HSU-II and the Work and Re-entry Center are allowed five visiting periods per week, Wednesday through Sunday.
    • Visiting on Wednesdays, Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays ends at 7:30 pm. Visiting on Thursdays, ends at 5:00 pm.
    • Visiting on Wednesdays and Fridays are for adults (age 18 and over) only.
    • Visiting on Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays is open to adults and minors.
  • On a case-by-case basis, visiting may be restricted for inmates who have restrictions in their sentencing orders related to contact between the inmate and others. This restriction may be imposed if it is in the interest of visitor safety, the security of the institution or the inmate’s rehabilitation.
    • Inmates meeting the above criteria are allowed visits only on Wednesdays and Fridays, when only adults (age 18 and over) are allowed to visit, and will receive written notice of the restriction to enable them to notify the people who are visiting them of the restrictions.
    • If an inmate is identified as meeting the requirements for the restriction, he may appeal it by submitting court papers to the security major that indicate the court orders have been changed or the restriction is in error.

3. Inmates can send or receive an unlimited amount of correspondence without restriction to
source, destination, or content if the inmate can afford postage and complies with this
procedure, unless reasonable belief exists that limitation is required to protect public
safety or the secure and orderly operation of the facility.

 Source: http://www.cor.mt.gov/content/MSP/MSPCorrespondencePolicy.pdf

The cost per day at the prisons varies due to the disparity in the services and programming provided and the custody levels of the inmates housed there. The cost per day at Crossroads is $63.98 for each inmate. The cost per day at Montana State Prison is $94.19. The higher rate is because MSP functions, to a great extent, as a special-needs facility in the Montana prison network.
MSP has specialized programs and services that are not available elsewhere. It has:
 A full infirmary that is capable of providing inmates with extensive and chronic medical and dental
needs
 Intensive treatment units for chemical dependent and methamphetamine-addicted inmates
 Sex offender treatment

Source: http://www.cor.mt.gov/content/Issues/PrisonSystem.pdf

  • This is all from Montana Department Of Corrections Website.   They did not even give a 30 day notice to inmates.  They did not give a 30 day notice at all to families so children could see their parent one last time.  Then to top it all off….they only handed out the new rules to this segment of the population this past Saturday evening June 16th,2012, (took effect 6-06-2012) while the rest of the population was in lock-down.  They called each inmate down one by one to the cages and gave them rules.  Allowing all other inmates in the population to know what this segment had been incarcerated for.  That is ENDANGERMENT!  They put these other inmates in a very volatile situation with inmates making jeers about “now they know why they are in prison for.”    Who is running these prisons? What would possess someone to announce this new change that way?  Why not put the new rules for this segment under the doors at night just like they do for mail? That would be the business way and smartest way to do this.   No, they intentionally did it that way to cause either a riot, cause a problem for those getting ready for parole, cause someone to get killed or someone to commit suicide.  These are the type of people running these facilities?  And you wonder why there is such a problem with suicides?  Not even giving the fact that some of these inmates are in there wrongly convicted or convicted of a different crime.


  • Other major issue.   They are going against their own policies as far as families are concerned.  Not all offenders are in there for pedophilia. As you have already seen all throughout this website they throw many under the label without there being reason too.  But….still…let’s go one more step….there is NO threat in the visiting area.  There is more staff at MSP then you ever see at any other facility. We have never seen so many officers at a prison. Other officers from other states agree when they hear this.  They say they are understaffed….but that is a joke.   They are hiring all the time, more females, which is what they have had a major felony scandal that was committed by female officers there at MSP. Female officers having sex with inmates, but they want to ignore that.  Young girls out of school should not be working at places such as this. Female officers hanging around with a group of inmates discussing other inmates cases.  Officers wanting to be noticed. There are officers loitering around everywhere.  Is this just a place to house jobs but you don’t want to call it warehousing inmates?  Well, if that is the case they have way over enough officers to do their jobs during visiting hours.  What are they getting paid for?  What is all this money in the budget going too?  They are cutting everything out.    Visits, phone calls (too expensive), mail (if they have money for postage), not allowed to have bibles donated to them. What kind of barbaric practices are being used at this facility?   Montanans want to know.  Us taxpayers want to know.  That is a lot of money for no one wanting to do their job or offer any humane services. 
Categories: MDOC/Abuse | Tags: , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Shame on America! More Blacks, Latinos in Jail than College Dorms!

File:U.S. incarceration rate by race 2.gif

+ Midyear 2009 Incarceration Rates by Race and Gender per 100,000 U.S. residents of the same race and gender. Prison Inmates at Midyear 2009 – Statistical Tables – US Bureau of Justice Statistics, published June 2010. See tables 16-19 for totals and rates for blacks, Hispanics, and whites. Broken down by year, gender, and age. See page 2 for “Selected characteristics of inmates held in custody in state or federal prisons or in local jails”. It has the overall incarceration rate. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

More than three times as many black people live in prison cells as in college dorms.

The ratio is only slightly better for Hispanics, at 2.7 inmates for every Latino in college housing. Among non-Hispanic whites, more than twice as many live in college housing as in prison or jail.

The numbers, driven by men, do not include college students who live off campus. Previously released census data show that black and Hispanic college students — commuters and those in dorms — far outnumber black and Hispanic prison inmates.

Nevertheless, civil rights advocates said it is startling that blacks and Hispanics are more likely to live in prison cells than in college dorms.

“It’s one of the great social and economic tragedies of our time,” said Marc Morial, president and CEO of the Urban League. “It points to the signature failure in our education system and how we’ve been raising our children.”

The Census Bureau released 2006 data Thursday on the social, racial and economic characteristics of people living in adult correctional facilities, college housing and nursing homes. It is the first in-depth look at people living in “group quarters” since the 1980 census. It shows, for example, that nursing homes had much older residents in 2006 than in 1980.

Commuter students not included
The new data has limitations. In addition to not including commuter students, it does not provide racial breakdowns by gender or age, though it does show that males make up 90 percent of prison inmates.

Also, most prison inmates are 25 or older while 96 percent of people in college housing are age 18 to 24.

The data show that big increases in black and Hispanic inmates occurred since 1980. In 1980, the number of blacks living in college dorms was roughly equal to the number in prison. Among Hispanics, those in college dorms outnumbered those in prison in 1980.

There are a lot of reasons why black students do not reach college at the same rate as whites, said Amy Stuart Wells, a professor of sociology and education at Columbia University’s Teachers College.

Black students are more likely to attend segregated schools with high concentrations of poverty, less qualified teachers, lower expectations and a less demanding curriculum, she said.

“And they are perceived by society as terrible schools, so it is hard to get accepted into college,” Wells said. “Even if you are a high-achieving kid who beats the odds, you are less likely to have access to the kinds of courses that colleges are looking for.”

Students who don’t graduate high school are much more likely to go to prison, said Gary Orfield, co-director of the Civil Rights Project at UCLA. Nearly 40 percent of inmates lack a high school diploma or the equivalent, according to the census data.

“The criminal economy is one of the only alternatives in some of these places,” Orfield said. “You basically have the criminalization of a whole community, particularly in some inner cities.”

Further report details
Blacks made up 41 percent of the nation’s 2 million prison and jail inmates in 2006. Non-Hispanic whites made up 37 percent and Hispanics made up 19 percent.

Morial, who is a former mayor of New Orleans, said the political debate over high incarceration rates for minorities hasn’t yielded results. He said conservatives blame a lack of family values while liberals blame a lack of government programs, with neither side seeing the whole picture.

“We do, in the African-American community, need to instill a stronger value on education,” Morial said.

But, he added, minority students also need more early childhood education, longer school days, longer school years and more meaningful summer job opportunities.

“We need to get serious about true investment on the front end,” Morial said.

Among the other findings in the census data:

  • Men made up about 90 percent of prison and jail inmates in 2006, down from 94 percent in 1980.
  • About 9 percent of prison inmates were immigrants last year, up from about 4 percent in 1980. Immigrants made up about 13 percent of the total population in 2006.
  • Non-Hispanic whites made up about 73 percent of the 2.3 million people living in college housing in 2006. Blacks made up about 12 percent, Asians about 7 percent and Hispanics about 6 percent.
Now you do realize that this number has only increased since this last census?  The prisons are only warehousing more inmates. 
Categories: MT Speaks Up | Tags: , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Witnesses Allege Inmate Abuse

Los Angeles County commission investigating jail abuse heard tearful testimony Monday from clergy and civilian monitors who said they witnessed assault and bullying.

Source: http://prisonmovement.wordpress.com/2012/04/19/witnesses-allege-inmate-abuse-in-l-a-county/

Law Enforcement, Correctional Officers And Those In Power Who Act As If They Are Above The Law

 

A Los Angeles County commission investigating jail abuse heard tearful testimony Monday from clergy and civilian monitors who worked in the lockups and said they witnessed deputies assaulting inmates and bullying witnesses to keep quiet.

One jail monitor broke down as she recounted being intimidated by a deputy whom she said saw beat an unconscious inmate. A weeping jail chaplain described deputies calling him a rat after he reported another beating. In one case, a clergy member said he was told by gang member inmates that jailers had targeted them in retribution for the slaying of a deputy by members of their gang on the outside. When the deputy’s widow heard the allegations, the chaplain said, she showed up at the jail and told the deputies they disgraced her husband’s memory.

The commission was created by the Board of Supervisors soon after news broke last year that the FBI was investigating allegations of inmate abuse and other jailer misconduct. The panel’s investigation is loosely modeled on that of the landmark Christopher Commission, which recommended sweeping reforms of the Los Angeles Police Department after the 1991 beating of Rodney King.

On Monday, the commission’s lead attorney revealed that after protests from the deputies’ union, the commission would no longer be getting unfettered access to disciplinary records. Instead, the commission is expected to receive data that identifies deputies not by name but unique numbers, so that potential problem jailers can be identified.

One commissioner expressed concern that the concession might “impair” the investigation, but the commission’s director downplayed the restrictions, saying that its aim is rooting out systemic problems not going after individual deputies.

Among those who spoke before the commission was former American Civil Liberties Union jail monitor Mary Tiedeman, who wept as she told the panel she resigned her post after becoming fed up with the department’s inaction despite all the allegations of abuse she was gathering.

Many of the speakers emphasized how strong an impact the captain at Men’s Central Jail can have on jailer culture. Retired Cmdr. Robert Olmsted, who last year told The Times of his attempts to warn sheriff’s officials about abuse, was praised by civilian monitors and clergy for being tough on deputies. His successor, Capt. Daniel Cruz, who was placed on leave after an investigation of his tenure was launched, was blamed by witnesses Monday for loosening the reins on problem deputies.

Tiedeman testified that top sheriff’s officials told her they were aware of Cruz’s mismanagement, but said that it was difficult to correct his actions because of internal politics. In February, The Times reported that Olmsted said he had tried to give Cruz a lackluster performance review, but his report was altered by a top sheriff’s official and Cruz was protected.

Father George Horan testified that when Olmsted was promoted out of the jail, some deputies were relieved to be freed from his watch. Soon after, a graveyard-themed jailhouse mural was vandalized, with someone scrawling “Olmsted RIP” on an image of a tombstone.

Horan said some deputies on the 3000 floor grew overly aggressive and cliquish until the problem came to a head in 2010, when deputies from the floor got into a brawl with fellow jailers at a department Christmas party. He said deputies on that floor hassled a fellow jailer, who had a reputation of being respectful with inmates, so much that the deputy asked for a transfer. He was being called names like “Deputy Love,” Horan said.

Horan also recounted the violent cell extraction of Latino gang members after the killing of Deputy Abel Escalante. He said multiple inmates told him that during the extraction, deputies announced it was revenge against the gang for killing Escalante. He said that when word of those allegations reached Escalante’s wife, a member of Horan’s parish, she was outraged and appeared at the jail to chastise the deputies.

Continue Reading @ Officer.com

Related articles

 

This has become quite a habit in many areas around the country.  America is tired of it.  (There was a poll done already that the majority wants less prisons and inmate population.)  These kind of issues happen right here in Montana.  If you read the articles in this website alone you will hear countless story after story.  Every time I meet someone they have first hand knowledge of issues that are running rampant within the state.   Testimonies and news paper articles concerning judges, county attorneys, public defenders, law enforcement, DOJ, DOC, the list goes on.  It boggles the mind. Montana citizens have become sick and tired of it all and we have decided to stand up and make a stand!  Join us in our voices to speak on the behalf of those that cannot let their voices be heard! 

Categories: MT Speaks Up | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment

ACLU Settles With Montana Department Of Corrections Over The Treatment Of Inmate

By MATT GOURAS Associated Press | Posted: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 6:00 am

HELENA – The American Civil Liberties Union said Monday that Montana prison officials have agreed to change their procedures to settle a complaint over a juvenile inmate placed in solitary confinement.

The ACLU sued in 2009 over the treatment of a 17-year-old boy they argued had spent more than a year in solitary confinement at the Montana State Prison. Raistlen Katka had been sent to the adult facility after officials said he assaulted a guard at a youth facility.

The ACLU said the settlement forces “significant” changes in the way vulnerable prisoners are handled, while the Department of Corrections downplayed the changes as minor adjustments to current procedure.

The settlement limits the amount of time juveniles can be placed in isolation and sets up new rules for treatment of mentally ill inmates in solitary confinement, the ACLU said.

Katka, who is now out of the prison on parole, welcomed the settlement.

“I brought this lawsuit so no one else would have to endure the torture I endured,” he said in a news release.

The ACLU said the agreement calls for top-level review after a juvenile has been in solitary confinement or a behavior management program for longer than 72 hours. It also specifies the lowest category of confinement for such offenders, unless they have significant prison problems or a conviction of a severe offense.

The deal also mandates new safeguards for mentally ill prisoners placed into solitary confinement, such as private treatment sessions.

Such treatment programs can have a “pronounced” effect on vulnerable prisoners, the ACLU said. The organization’s attorney, Andree Larose, called the agreement “a step in the right direction toward making sure inmates are treated humanely and consistent with the Montana Constitution.”

The ACLU has said that Katka’s behavior improved once he was taken out of the behavior management programs, which the group said included stripping him naked with only a smock to wear.

An attorney for the Montana Department of Corrections said the settlement does not make significant changes, and mostly just formalizes current procedures.

“With minor exceptions, which were perfectly acceptable to prison administration, the settlement agreement simply memorializes what the prison has been doing as a matter of course for what has always been a small subset of the inmate population,” Max Davis, an attorney working with the DOC on the case, said in a statement.

Source: http://www.ravallirepublic.com/news/local/article_5f85942c-ccad-5c96-92cf-4db0d603c0d7.html#ixzz1sMkinqdW

I cannot believe the arrogance in that one statement “An attorney for the Montana Department of Corrections said the settlement does not make significant changes, and mostly just formalizes current procedures.”   In the last article you saw all the civil lawsuits against DOC.  ACLU has had to have a lawsuit against the Public Defender‘s office for not giving their clients “fair representation.”   I  just posted about a Native American that tried to commit suicide at Montana State Prison.  The procedures at Montana State Prison are they make their own law, their own rules, they answer to no one, and the procedures they follow…are indeed their own procedures…whatever they happen to decide what it is at the moment.  Montana families are becoming outraged of the treatment that is going on behind closed doors and gates.  It is barbaric and abusive. 

More information regarding case: http://montanacorruption.org/press-release-from-aclu/

http://montanacorruption.org/press-release-from-aclu/robert-doe-a-minor-name-changed/

Categories: MDOC/Abuse, MT Speaks Up | Tags: , , , , , , | 2 Comments

AG Steve Bullock And Funds Or Friends?

Steve Bullock, who Schweitzer has publicly endorsed, has collected thousands from lobbyists most of which are from out of state for instance:

Excerpt From Treasure State Politics of Montana

The report goes on to call out Brian Schweitzer’s cronysim, recalling Schweitzer hiring his former college roommate Joe Maurier to run the Department of Fish Wildlife and Parks the report states:

“a rash of top-level hires by the current administration has raised questions of cronyism.”

The defense this time comes from Schweitzer’s spokesperson Sarah Elliot:

“Gov. Schweitzer is the only governor in recent history who did not take PAC (political action committee) money for either of his campaigns for governor

“The lobbyist culture of Helena has not been able to buy their way to the front of the line, so it is no surprise they are critical of the governor.”

This sentence is a little misleading, just because Schweitzer didn’t collect PAC money doesn’t mean he didn’t collect lobbyist money.  Which of course he did. political action committees and lobbyists are similar but still two completely separate things. Though even if you believe that lobbyist disclosure is only one of the 5 failing grades Montana received.

In addition Steve Bullock, who Schweitzer has publicly endorsed, has collected thousands from lobbyists most of which are from out of state for instance: See Above Form

Source: http://www.treasurestatepolitics.com/

We have an Attorney General that is taking money from outside lobbyists.  Both Steve Bullock and Gov. Schweitzer has received funds from CCA.  Which is of course a large corporation.  Follow the trail, yes, Bullock wanting to expand more on crime prevention and the “sex offender” round-ups (which we have already been told that only 4% is true sex offenders that the community needs to be concerned about. That leaves 96% that they are just making money from the system.)  We have DOC in meetings about going completely privatized, prison plans on suspension until they see what the trend of inmate population is going to be.  That population according to DOJ in Helena, states that it is going to be about 700+ per fiscal year.  A whopping leap from 150 per fiscal year. 94% being returned back to prison for technical violations and not for breaking the law by probation officers. You see on the news about inmates not receiving proper medical care nor being released when they are eligible for parole.  

You are reading in the news papers about the ACLU having to defend the rights of those being charged because the Montana public defenders are not doing their jobs.   There are internal investigative documents of DOJ that another group, MAP is suing for them because there is misconduct going on in the DOJ, and the DCI concerning investigations.  That is not even talking about the millions that were riding upon the conviction of one man for DPHHS to receive their funding. Where the evidence was tampered with,  lying that was going on during the investigation.  Threats being made to the defendant. Proof of DNA that supports his innocence.  This was federal money that was received. 

You read the newspapers about the judges that are taking bribes, committing crimes and we are putting our complete trust in them for our future?   For our children’s future?  Montana, we as citizens should be highly, highly concerned about this.  All of this is in our state alone.  If you did not know what was happening before, you are becoming educated now.  Take charge of your life and speak up Montana!! 

 There is a lot of money floating around in Montana.  It is cleverly being disguised by them victimizing you, preying upon your fears.  That they are doing this in your best interest, to make Montana safer.  The money is floating out of your wallet into their wallet’s.   My Montanan friends, be careful of who you are electing into office.  You could be slamming the prison door for yourself and your family.  


Categories: Montana Politics, The Real MT | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Supermaxed Out: Adios to an Isolation Facility

Supermaxed Out: Adios to an Isolation Facility

Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn aims to shutter the notorious Tamms prison—but it ain’t a done deal.

Prison officials finally realized “that many of the prisoners who had spent years there really didn’t need to be there,” noted legal advocate Alan Mills.

MONTANA STATE PRISON WARDEN TALKING TO SOLITARY CONFINEMENT INMATE

Supermax prisons have been a growth industry in the United States since at least 1989, when California opened its notorious lockup at Pelican Bay. Today, at least 44 states and the federal government maintain supermax prisonswhere upwards of 25,000 inmates are confined to small cells 23/7. Despite the high cost of solitary confinement and a growing movement that denounces this kind of long-term isolation as a form of torture, supermax prisons just keep on opening. They rarely ever close.

That’s why Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn made big news last Wednesday when he proposed closing the state’s notorious Tamms supermax. The proposal is part of a package of deep spending cuts to nearly all areas of state government, which Quinn called a “rendezvous with reality.”

Tamms holds nearly 200 prisoners in long-term isolation under conditions that have been denounced as torturous. Prisoners at Tamms can leave their cells only to shower or to exercise alone in a concrete pen. They are fed through slots in the cell doors and are allowed no communal activities, no phone calls, and visits only through a thick glass wall after the inmate is shackled and strip-searched. The supermax opened in 1998, purportedly as a short-term solution for prisoners with discipline problems. Yet a decade later, one-third of its original inmates were still there.

As is the case with most supermax facilities, a high percentage Tamms inmates suffer from serious mental illness. In its 14-year history, Tamms has witnessed many inmate suicides, suicide attempts, and self mutilations. One inmate cut off part of his own genitals and hung them on his cell door.

In addition to the human costs, supermax incarceration is extraordinarily expensive: By one calculation, the cost of locking someone up at Tamms exceeds $92,000 per year per prisoner—about three to four times the per-prisoner cost for the state’s other maximum-security lockups.

David Fathi, of the ACLU‘s National Prison Project, which advocates for an end to long-term isolation of prisoners, told the Chicago Sun-Times: “Shutting down the vessel of human suffering and sinkhole for taxpayer dollars that is Tamms would be an important step toward ending the use of solitary confinement across the nation.”

If it actually happens.

On Sunday, the Sun-Times cautioned that the Tamms closure was “not a done deal.” That’s because “the plan is triggering an outcry from the prison’s local legislative delegation and major pushback from the union representing 300 of Tamms’ staff, which characterizes the facility as ‘irreplaceable.’” Some of the opposition is coming comes from within Quinn’s own party, including Democrat Gary Forby, a state senator whose district hosts Tamms.

“I’m mad as hell,” Forby tweeted as news of the governor’s plan emerged. “I don’t know where this guy is coming from.”

It is a shame that Democrat Gary Forby is for torturing and is for long term sentencing.  Makes me wonder if he receives kickbacks from the profit of prisons.

To Continue Reading:  http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/illinois-close-supermax-security-prison-tamms

Categories: MT Speaks Up | Tags: , , , , | 1 Comment

Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Customized Adventure Journal by Contexture International.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 526 other followers

%d bloggers like this: