Posts Tagged With: Crime

Data Report: More Than 2,000 False Convictions In Past 23 Years They Allot Over 10,000 Years!

In 1984, two North Carolina girls, age 4 and 6, were molested. They told police their abuser was Sylvester Smith, who was dating the mother of one of the girls, and he went to prison for the crime.

Twenty years later, the victims recanted, saying their grandmother told them to blame Smith, and his conviction was overturned.

But the person they say who really molested them — their cousin, who was nine at the time — could not be prosecuted because he was under age at the time of the alleged crime. He is, however, serving a life sentence for another crime he committed in the meantime: murder.

Smith’s case illustrates the fallout from false convictions: He lost roughly 20 years of his life to prison, while the alleged perpetrator was free to commit other crimes.

Chris Seward/ The News & Observer (Raleigh), file

Sylvester Smith, center, smiles after he was granted a new trial after two witnesses recanted their testimony in a Brunswick County courtroom in Bolivia, N.C., Nov. 5, 2004. He had wrongfully served 20 years on a sexual assault charge.

Smith’s discarded conviction is one of nearly 900 such cases filed in the National Registry of Exonerations, a database of prisoners exonerated in the U.S. of serious crimes since 1989, that was made public on Monday. To qualify as an “exoneree,” an individual must have been convicted and later relieved of all the legal consequences.

In compiling the database, researchers became aware of more than 1,100 other cases in which convictions were overturned due to 13 separate police corruption scandals, most of which involved the planting of drugs or guns on innocent defendants. Those exonerations are not included in the registry. 

University of Michigan Law School discovered correlations in the types of crimes and reasons for wrongful convictions.

  • Fabricated crimes. False convictions in child sex abuse cases were usually due to fabricated crimes; sometimes a divorced parent told a child to make up lies about an ex-spouse abusing them, or police or a therapist convinced a child to say something that wasn’t true.
  • Eyewitness mistakes. In adult rape cases, for example, false convictions were typically based on eyewitness mistakes, “more often than not, mistakes by white victims falsely identifying black defendants,” the report said.
  • Misconduct by authorities. For homicides, misconduct by authorities was the second-biggest cause of false convictions, just behind false eyewitness accounts.

Smith asked for a pardon from the governor, but was denied.

Now 61 and in poor health, he lives with his wife — who he was married to but separated from before he went to prison — in Brunswick County, N.C., and has established a friendship with one of the victims who accused him, his lawyer said.

Not all exonerees who leave prison are able to reintegrate back into society like Smith, despite a court proclaiming them innocent.

“Even if people honestly believe that this person was truly innocent, there is a certain stigma that comes with the mere fact that you were in prison,” Simon said. ”You were with bad people, you were antisocial, you had to live in the jungle-like societies you often find in prisons.”

Sometimes, families break up when a defendant goes to prison. Finding a job after release can be hard too.

“Often times, the state is really unhelpful. There is no automatic method to get your criminal record expunged,” Simon said. “And they have huge holes in their results, and often times they lack the skills that would help you get a job. Everyone else was studying while you were stuck in a cell.”

Simon believes the registry will help reform the justice system because it helps experts analyze the causes of false convictions. The creators are still adding cases to ExonerationRegistry.org. Gross said he hopes exonerees will contact his team if they had their convictions overturned and don’t see their story in the database.

This is not something new, it is not a conspiracy theory.  This happens too much and there are more cases but they cannot get to all of them.  Montana this is happening here in this state and hearing DOJ and what they are asking for will make this happen at a rapid pace.  The handwriting is on the wall.  They want an increased budget to add 700+ per fiscal year to the sex offender registry.  DOC held off with the new prison plan where their proposal claimed only 150 offenders per fiscal year.  Notice the word offender, not sex offender that DOJ has requested.   DOJ and DPHHS has asked that it be made mandatory that if anyone calls in about “suspected” abuse that DPHHS will automatically have to refer it to the sheriff’s department instead of them investigating it themselves first.  You already seen the study about ex-spouses fabricating lies.  What if someone decides they don’t like you and they want revenge?  They say it will be kept confidential, no it will not.  I can guarantee that.   Now we have different counties coming up with all these sex offenses, I am telling you it does not add up.  What adds up is that they believe that we are going to remain stupid to what is going on and how they are making money.  Also, lets add in the fact that CCA is wining and dining some of our politicians. CCA has contributed to campaigns here in Montana. They just put in a national proposal for 48 states of prisons with a contract of 20 years for 90%+ occupancy.  What better way to ensure that contract by abusing the sex offender status.  Oh Montana, don’t allow this to happen!  Let’s not demean those victims that truly go through these horrible type crimes.  Let’s ensure that the real criminals will be put behind bars and not innocent people.  No more allowing other inmates of crimes of theft, drug charges, DUI’s etc. to be labeled sex offenders.  This is abuse of the registry! 

Categories: The Innocent | Tags: , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Steve Bullock Announces New Approach

Elmer arrested for "indecent southern exp...

ELMER FUDD BEING ARRESTED FOR INDECENT EXPOSURE

Montana Attorney General Steve Bullock announced Monday a new statewide effort “Successfully protecting kids and prosecuting offenders requires all of us working together,” Bullock said at a press conference in Billings announcing the creation of the Children’s Justice Center.

While the name implies a brick-and-mortar structure, the new effort is focused on bringing specialists from state and local agencies together in a team approach when dealing with child victims and child offenders. The program is overseen by a former state child protective services worker in Helena.

To date, 17 teams of specialists have been created statewide to work under the umbrella of the Children’s Justice Center. Participants include members from six state Department of Justice programs and other state and local officials who use a team approach to track child predators and work with child victims.

The programs, many of them started by Bullock in recent years, already exist so no new funding is required, he said.

How is this new?  This is something that he has always promoted for political votes and it generates money to line pockets for certain people higher up when the rest of the communities are in a recession. Continue to next article which will explain that statement.  Let’s put our tax money to where it is going to make a difference.  This gives you a look at how Montana qualifies a sex offender.  We need better guidelines so parents know who they need to protect their children from.

Read more: http://billingsgazette.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/bullock-announces-new-approach-to-protecting-children-convicting-child-offenders/article_f2110779-aba6-5c0c-b564-6a600b0047a6.html#ixzz1mc4U1mYq

Not all sexual offenders are the same or should be treated similarly, they’re not all pedophiles said Gallatin County Attorney Marty Lambert.

“People need to recognize that sexual intercourse without consent of an 18-year-old with a 15-year-old that, in every other sense of the word, was consensual” is not the same as an adult sexually abusing a child, he said. “The only thing making the (teen’s crime) illegal is the statute saying that a person of the age of 15 cannot give consent.”It should be seen entirely differently than a pedophile’s crime, which “isn’t just a teenage dalliance,” Lambert said.

According to state Department of Corrections statistics, pedophiles represent less than 4 percent of the sexual offender population in Montana.

Of 91 sexual offenders on Gallatin County’s registry, four are considered to have a high risk to re-offend. Yet only one of those four committed a crime against a child.

Sexual crimes cover a wide spectrum of charges, from Peeping Tom and indecent exposure to raping a child. Yet all of the offenders are mandated to register and are condemned to the sexual offender list.

About 34 percent of Montana’s current prisoners were convicted of sexual crimes, according to statistics compiled by Blair Hopkins, a therapist who treats sexual offenders in the state prison.  34 percent of Montana’s current prisoners?  What would be the percentage including those that were convicted in the past?   That is quite a high number of sex offenders!  Something wrong with that number.

“Registration gives people a false sense of security because (those registered) are not the ones who are offending,” said Fred Lemons, who initiated the prison-based treatment program in 1980. “Ninety percent of the time it’s a family member, acquaintance or neighbor – someone with an established relationship” with the victim.  Read more: http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/news/crime/article_57b6931c-9f9d-11e0-aff1-001cc4c03286.html

Wouldn’t it be better to make the sex offender label for those that really need it and are a danger to children and the community?   Why are we wasting tax payers money on labeling and on a registry for teenagers?  If this was in effect 50 years ago how many of the older people of the community would be on this list?   A thought to ponder.  If you go to the bathroom out in the woods while you are hunting, that is in public.  By law that is indecent exposure, how many hunters would be labeled a sex offender?  This is scary friends!  I am not soft on crime, I have testified against some that have ended up in prison. Let’s use wisdom.  Allow us to really protect our children and citizens with doing this right.  Not a system that is making money off a label that then becomes broken and we don’t know which ones are a real threat and those that are not. That would be something NEW! 

Categories: Montana Politics, MT DPHHS/DOJ | Tags: , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

False Security In Montana

This subject is a hard one to write about.  This is not a topic that is liked nor tolerated and all for good reasons.  We must protect our communities and our citizens.  This topic has unbelievably found its way into the stage-coach with the gold.  I will be lenient in saying that there may good and well be those politicians that do not completely understand what has been happening in this field and really feel that they are protecting the citizens.  As for other politicians they know exactly what they are doing and this just puts more funds into the coffer.

I am talking about the notorious “Sex Offender” label.    I am not soft on crime.  I have worked with DOC and I have testified in courtrooms for both prosecutors and for defense attorneys.  I have helped to sentence and I have helped to defend. I have sat on a jury and yes, we found the defendant guilty.  I believe in being held accountable. I believe in having a safe community.  The “Sex Offender” label has gotten way out of hand.  This is not what it was originally intended for.  This label is to help us, the community to know who is really dangerous, who could be a threat to us or our children.  When that label is passed out frivolously we lose the seriousness of it by making all incidents seem that they are of major concern.  Example:  Teenage couples engage in sex…the young man is charged and then labeled an offender.  If this law was mandated lets say 60 years ago…just how many sex offenders would there be today?  Then there are the lesser crimes that are not taken into consideration.  Those that have had no prior criminal history and a one time incident that would have been inappropriate touch turns out to be a felony of “Sexual Assault.”  I had a public defender tell me that if I were in a crowded bar and a man were to touch me as he is standing there in a place that I feel is inappropriate or bumps into me accidental but I feel is still inappropriate  I can press charges for “Sexual Assault” because that is how I perceived it. This is not the real meaning of “Sexual Assault.” If this was mandated in the last 60 years how many “Sex Offenders” would we have?

Now we have thousands upon thousands of sex offenders that we are scrutinizing.  Some that are labeled for ridiculous reasons. While we are trying to keep track of so many we lose sight of the dangerous ones that could re-offend or even those that do not have a label.  This is a false sense of security.  It also causes major problems for those that are labeled for the rest of their life or for what the sentence allows as it is hard for them to find jobs, hard to find a place to live, hard to support their families.  Where do you expect these people to go?    Read this article from Bozeman, MT:

http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/news/crime/article_57b6931c-9f9d-11e0-aff1-001cc4c03286.html

You may be wondering at this point what this has to do with politics or money.  Let me show you a few statistics and refresh you from an earlier subject.

“About 34 percent of Montana’s current prisoners were convicted of sexual crimes, according to statistics compiled by Blair Hopkins, a therapist who treats sexual offenders in the state prison. Of those, more than 90 percent are undergoing or are waiting to begin intensive sexual offender treatment.”  *Source Bozeman Daily Chronicle

That states 34 percent.  That is a very large number.  We discussed the prisons for profit.  We discussed the parole board not letting many out on parole. Let’s take one more step down the trail that leads to revenue.   We discussed that once they are out on parole by their very own figures 94% return back to prison because of technical violations, not for breaking the law.  What better way than to have that many labeled sex offenders, that once paroled, with as hard as it is to find a place that will allow them to live there, to find a job that will hire them are unable to report or register as they are commanded to do.  Probation officers are then violating them and sending them back.  The same inmates are being recycled for profit.  The short time while they are on parole they have to pay a fee.  They also have to pay a fee to take the mandated classes.  Those classes can take up to 10 years to finish.  If they are not finished they end up in prison again.  Cha-ching, Cha-ching.

Then you have those that have been railroaded based on “hearsay” with no evidence.  In these classes you have to admit complete guilt that is described on your DOC record from the county attorney.  Those that are innocent are not going to want to do that.  They then cannot pass the class nor be let out of prison.  I have seen this first hand. I have documents that back this up.   I have seen county attorneys accept a plea bargain that states one way in court transcripts but then in the media and DOC records they have added more to the plea bargain.   Too many cases like that.  I have seen where they tell a defendant that they have to be a registered sex offender but then after the sentencing find out via the media that it was not court mandated by law. It is something that the county attorney put together. Yes, the public defender had lied and did not tell the truth about the law.   No matter how hard they try the defendant cannot get anyone to correct the records.  That my friends is a group of outlaw cowboys when you cannot find anyone to help you.   I find the statistics and all of the same allegations of foul play and records that prove that some of these are innocent but they are all found guilty anyway extremely disturbing!  What if someone falsely accuses you? What if your spouse is falsely accused?  What if your teenage son or daughter is falsely accused?  What do you do when the system is tainted? Again, pray that they never want to use you or any member of your family for their gain.

Categories: Montana DOJ, Montana Politics | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Customized Adventure Journal by Contexture International.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 526 other followers

%d bloggers like this: